PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY
v. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
G.R. No. 152685, 4 December 2007
Corporation Law Case Digest by John Paul C.
Ladiao (15 March 2016)
(Topic: Subscription Contract)
FACTS:
This case pertains to Section 40
(e) of the Public Service Act (PSA), as amended on March 15, 1984, pursuant
to Batas Pambansa Blg. 325, which authorized the NTC to collect from public
telecommunications companies Supervision and Regulation Fees (SRF) of PhP 0.50
for every PhP 100 or a fraction of the capital and stock subscribed or paid for
of a stock corporation, partnership or single proprietorship of the capital
invested, or of the property and equipment, whichever is higher.
Under
Section 40 (e) of the PSA, the NTC sent SRF assessments to petitioner
Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (PLDT) starting sometime in 1988.
The SRF assessments were based on the market value of the outstanding capital
stock, including stock dividends, of PLDT. PLDT protested the assessments
contending that the SRF ought to be based on the par value of its outstanding
capital stock. Its protest was denied by the NTC and likewise, its motion for
reconsideration.
PLDT
appealed before the CA. The CA modified the disposition of the NTC by holding
that the SRF should be assessed at par value of the outstanding capital stock
of PLDT, excluding stock dividends.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the value
transferred from the unrestricted retained earnings of PLDT to the capital
stock account pursuant to the issuance of stock dividends is the proper basis
for the assessment of the SRF?
RULING:
NO.
In the case
of stock dividends, it is the amount that the corporation transfers from its
surplus profit account to its capital account. It is the same amount that can
be loosely termed as the trust fund of the corporation. The Trust Fund doctrine
considers this subscribed capital as a trust fund for the payment of the debts
of the corporation, to which the creditors may look for satisfaction. Until the
liquidation of the corporation, no part of the subscribed capital may be
returned or released to the stockholder (except in the redemption of redeemable
shares) without violating this principle. Thus, dividends must never impair the
subscribed capital; subscription commitments cannot be condoned or remitted;
nor can the corporation buy its own shares using the subscribed capital as the
considerations therefor.
When stock
dividends are distributed, the amount declared ceases to belong to the corporation
but is distributed among the shareholders. Consequently, the unrestricted
retained earnings of the corporation are diminished by the amount of the
declared dividend while the stockholders equity is increased. Furthermore, the
actual payment is the cash value from the unrestricted retained earnings that
each shareholder foregoes for additional stocks/shares which he would otherwise
receive as required by the Corporation Code to be given to the stockholders
subject to the availability and conditioned on a certain level of retained
earnings.
In essence,
therefore, the stockholders by receiving stock dividends are forced to exchange
the monetary value of their dividend for capital stock, and the monetary value
they forego is considered the actual payment for the original issuance of the
stocks given as dividends. Therefore, stock dividends acquired by shareholders
for the monetary value they forego are under the coverage of the SRF and the
basis for the latter is such monetary value as declared by the board of
directors.
No comments:
Post a Comment